Tuesday, January 6, 2009
Happy B'day A. R. Rahman...
Tuesday, December 30, 2008
Cheteshwar Pujara - The Next Best Thing in Indian Cricket???
Triple Ton Dealer
26 Dec 2008
| Cricket Player: Cheteshwar Pujara His prodigious rungetting abilities and classical style are leading selectors and experts to talk of this wonder kid as India’s third ‘Little Master’ |
In fact, Pujara got his first triple ton when he was only 13, scoring 306 not out in an under-14 tournament against Baroda in 2001. Since then, he has done other things of note: he was Man of the Tournament at the 2006 Under-19 World Cup, aggregating 349 runs; he scored over 800 runs in the 2007-08 Ranji Trophy; and this season he has scored two triple centuries in the under-22 C.K. Nayadu Trophy — 386 against Maharashtra and 309 against Mumbai — and one in Ranji Trophy — 302 not out against Orissa. He has also got big hundreds against top domestic teams with international bowlers in their ranks — 189 against Punjab and 176 against Mumbai.
Indian selectors are already under immense public pressure to let loose the wonder kid in the international arena. National selection committee Chairman K. Srikkanth has acknowledged him as a great prospect.
Trained in the classical mould by his father and coach, Arvind, himself a former Saurashtra cricketer, Pujara’s life-changing break came when the Indian Premier Le
ag
ue (IPL) franchise Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) hired him. Though he did not get a game in the tournament, he got an opportunity to share the dressing room with international stalwarts such as Ricky Ponting and Saurav Ganguly. “I listened, watched and learnt in the dressing room,” he says. The exposure to the hell-for-leather Twenty20 cricket helped him add gears to his batting. He says his hitting rate has improved considerably, which has allowed him to score big hundreds in quick time to set up wins for his teams. “Pujara has a great work ethic and he is a tremendous prospect,” says KKR Team Director Joy Bhattacharya.
Looking at his potential, Nike and Pepsi have already signed up Pujara, who is being marketed by Mindscapes Maestros, a firm allegedly backed by Indian cricket team captain M.S. Dhoni.
Indian cricket lovers are waiting to see whether Pujara can take his stupendous run-making ability to international cricket. In the past, many domestic cricket tigers have come a cropper at the highest level — Ashok Mankad, Brijesh Patel, Ashok Malhotra. “The pace and the skills of the international bowlers are quite different,” Pujara acknowledges, and he trains for hostile fast bowling using a bowling machine. “Also, I treat the games against strong teams such as Mumbai and Delhi as practice for the next level,” he says. His failure in both innings against Delhi in a recent Ranji match disappointed him, as well as his well wishers, hugely.
With Indian batsmen routinely doing well in home games against foreign teams, Pujara can hope for a break when India goes down under to New Zealand in March 2009. It will be best for him to prove himself in away international games first.
Source: Businessworld Issue 30 Dec 08-05 Jan 09 (http://www.businessworld.in/index.php/Media-Entertainment/Triple-Ton-Dealer.html)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here are a couple of articles on Pujara:
http://www.cricketworld.com/internationalcricketnews/india/domestic_news/article/?aid=18010
Corporate governance: The strange case of Satyam
I serve as an independent Director on the Board of Infosys Technologies which, in instances, competes with Satyam for bagging key projects. What follows here has nothing to do with my being on the Board of Infosys; it has everything to do with the tenets of corporate governance that I believe in and have publicly advocated for the last decade.
In Arthur Conan Doyle’s Silver Blaze, Watson asks Sherlock Holmes, “Is there any point to which you wish to draw my attention?” Holmes replies, “To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time.” Watson says, “But the dog did nothing in the nighttime.”
But, when management contemplates something, which may be inimical to the value or reputation of the company, or hurts the rights of minority shareholders, it is their responsibility to bark. No definition of ‘independence’ matters if, at the end of the day, you cannot stand up to the management and be counted.
Now to the Satyam episode. Here are the reported facts. Satyam is a publicly listed company in India and in the US. Its promoters, led by Mr Ramalinga Raju, own 8.74 per cent of the shares of the company. The public owns almost 72 per cent of the stock, of which 48 per cent is held by foreign institutional investors (FIIs) and 12.9 per cent by Indian public financial institutions (FIs).
This is what Satyam’s management and promoters proposed. A group representing only 8.74 per cent of the stock, wanted to use $1.6 billion of Satyam’s free cash to buy 51 per cent of Maytas Infra for $1.3 billion, and 100 per cent of Maytas Properties for $300 million. Maytas is Satyam spelled backwards; and over 36 per cent of Maytas is owned by Raju’s family, led by his sons Rama Raju and Teja Raju.
Let’s assume that the valuations were right. Even so, this was a massive related party transaction. In effect, persons representing a mere 8.74 per cent of a listed entity were proposing to transfer a whopping $1.6 billion of the company’s cash to pay related promoters (i.e., themselves) of another company.
Irrespective of the debatable strategic merits of the deal—an IT company wanting to de-risk by purchasing infrastructure assets— corporate governance ethics demand that such a proposal ought to have been sounded out to institutional investors before making the announcement. And if that was done, the conclusion was foregone: FIIs and FIs would have given their thumbs down, as they indeed did.
The Satyam episode is a lesson in more ways than one. It shows that managements can put forward questionable transactions and expect Boards to give their assent—a fact that should make independent directors be ever more vigilant in discharging their fiduciary responsibilities. It also shows the power of institutional shareholders and the press. This is the second instance in recent times where FIIs and the fourth estate have forced management to rescind decisions that are inimical to shareholder interests. Hats off for that. Because codes of corporate governance are only guideposts. When you deviate, the press and activist shareholders have to severely rap your knuckles.
Monday, December 22, 2008
A picture speaks a thousand words...
Found this nice picture...
Sunday, December 21, 2008
Saina v/s Sania: Real v/s Pseudo star
Saina Nehwal (born 17 March 1990) is one of the finds of Indian sports in 2008!
Saina went down fighting (21-15, 14-21, 21-16) to Chen Wang of Hong Kong in the semi-final in the recent World Super Series Masters - one of the most prestigious and elite Badminton tournaments.
Saina was declared as the 'most promising player of the year' by the World Badminton Federation, in its council meeting in Seoul. Her election is made out of three players proposed by the world body ahead of one Korean and one from Pan America.
Saina has been in the peak of her performance this year and became the first Indian women to break into the list of world top-10. She achieved many excellences during this year like reaching the quarterfinals of Beijing Olympics and winning titles at Taipei Open, World Junior championship and Commonwealth Youth Games.
Saina is the first Indian woman to reach the singles quarterfinals at the Olympics and the first Indian to win the World Junior Badminton Championships.
But what is more heartening about Saina is her dedication and committment to her sport - Badminton! In spite of suddenly gaining an iconic status in last year or so - Saina is raely seen in advertisements, promotional campaigns or other social events. Her focus has constantly been to keep improving her game, fitness and ranking. She comes across as very soft-spoken, down-to-earth yet very focussed individual who has her priorities clearly set (towards Badminton and not fashion/ advertisemnts).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Her commitment to sport stands out as a stark contrast to another of India's (over??) hyped child prodigy - Sania Mirza (born November 15, 1986) - who shook the Indian tennis world just a few years ago. Like Saina (or even to a greater extent) Sania revolutionized tennis - girl's/ women's tennis to be precise - in India. As a 16 year old she showed great spark and promise when she participated in Grand Slam. Sania also did quite well to improve her Singles ranking to a career high of 27 ...But that was all!
Since then Sania started her journey towards becoming 'Indian Anna Kournikova'. Sania became a regular in fashion shows/ advertisements than in tennis tournaments and was lured away from the game by the instant stardom. During last year or so her game has so lowered (also because of injuries/ lack of fitness) that she ends year 2008 as ranked 101...yes from a career high of 30 she has droped below 100. What is more disturbing is the fact that she doesn't seem to care much about it (with her ad campaigns and exclusive photoshoots going in full swing).
There is no denying that Sania has inspired many kids - especially girls - across India to turn pro in. tennis. Though her influence cannot yet be compared to Vishy Anand's in Chess or Sachin's in Cricket, she definitely has ability to inspire many more! And that is precisely why I feel that she should be more careful the way she carries in public. Of couse she has every right to behave as she wishes, may
be give up tennis, but still I honestly feel that she can learn a thing or two from Vishy Anand and Sachin who have set exceptionally high standards in the way they behave in their personal and public life.
This reminds me of my favourite movie 'Good Will Hunting' which deals with a similar - but not exactly the same - issue; that when a person is gifted or exceptionally talented at something, does he have a duty towards the society to give it back though that talent - or does he, as an individual, has right to do in life what he chooses - even if means completely wasting the gift, the talent...
I immensely liked the film (the idea or the script - to be precise) More about it later...
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Satyam Computer Services and Corporate Governance
he acquisition of the privately held Maytas Properties for $1.3 billion and increasing its stake in Maytas Infra to 51 per cent for $300 million.
Maytas Infra is engaged in the business of infrastructure construction and asset development spanning core areas of economic growth such as highways, metro/railways, ports, transport management systems, airports, power, oil and gas, irrigation and water treatment.
olders have lost faith in the management. They feel that Satyam has betrayed them.
al investors and other biggies are considering ousting the Satyam management for not considering shareholder's interest...if that is done that will be a welcome decision that would send a strong message to top management of all firms - that they are there to serve interest of primary shareholders...